Thursday, February 6, 2014

Montana's Diversity and Radicals: Janette Rankin to the Freeman

While the geographical diversity might be obvious from the moment you enter Montana (the flat prairie of Eastern Montana contrasting with the stunning Mountains in the West), the diversity within Montanans might not be so obvious.  For one thing most Montanans are white.  You can’t really say a place is ethnically diverse because there are Norwegians, Irish and Italians all living on the same block.  Obviously there are some non-white people groups within Montana but the percentage compared to other states is pretty low.  No, what I am talking about is political diversity. 

Montana has always been and still is a place of radical political views.  Janette Rankin may have started the tradition when she voted against World War I along with seven others in the US House of Representatives (and this was before women had the right to vote nationally).  Then she solidified her place in history, by becoming the only member of US Congress to vote against World War II.  You must admit that took true conviction!

On the other side of the political spectrum, somewhere to the right of constitutionalism and the left of pure anarchism, many Montanans prefer not to interact with the government at all.  There are a growing number of “off-the-gridders” who, correctly or incorrectly, are often associated with the nationally famous Freemen Militia.  These folks try to live as far away from the US Government’s reach as possible and apparently the rural areas of Montana are a great place to do that. 

Montanans are also prone to making outrageous political statements.  Whether it’s a county commissioner telling a group of Native Americans to plant their sacred tree somewhere else because he doesn't want a bunch of “drunk Indians” in his county, or the governor using a hot branding iron to veto (by fire) the opposing party’s bill on the steps of the capital, Montanans have no problem expressing their opinions in extreme and socially unacceptable ways. 


Ideas have consequences and I don’t want to make light of the consequences of some of the above ideas.  Extreme ideas lead to destruction and genocides, but they also lead to declarations of independence and successful overthrows (violent and non-violent) of tyrannical rulers.  I, for one, am very glad I live in a state where people say what they think and don’t pussy-foot-around when it comes to standing up for their beliefs!

No comments:

Post a Comment