Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Are fly fisherman really morally superior? The chain of sportsman snobbery



And we were left to assume, as my brother and I did, that all first-class fishermen on the Sea of Galilee were fly fishermen and that John, the favorite, was a dry-fly fisherman.

Norman McClain- A River Runs Through It

In his novel which was set in the 1920s, A River Runs through It, Norman McLain clearly demonstrates the feeling of moral superiority felt by fly fisherman over bait fisherman.  In the quote above and others, particularly the interaction between Norman and Paul with Norman’s brother-in-law (a bait fisherman), one can clearly see the sportsman snobbery that persists to this day.  In the last century, as hunting and fishing gradually shifted from an efficient way to provide food for your family, to more of a leisure lifestyle choice, outdoorsmen have become snobs.  Each outdoorsman finds some way to look down on other outdoorsmen who enjoy related outdoor pass times.  

Hunters and fishermen seem particularly prone to these types of comparisons.  You might insist that this is simply human nature and you might be right, but when it comes to outdoorsmen, it takes a strange twist.  For thousands of years, humans have been hunting and fishing as a means of survival but only recently have they intentionally limited themselves in how and when they can participate in these activities.  Hunting and fishing, in many ways, are trending back to the caveman.  Montana recently even passed a law that legalizes spear hunting!  It seems the more primitive and minimalistic your gear and techniques are, the more of a pure sportsman you are.  If you look back to the cave man days, it is hard to imagine “Grog” telling his brother “Gronk” that it is unsportsmanlike to hunt mammoths with iron spear tips…. “Idiot!  The way of the purist, the way of the sportsman, is most certainly the obsidian spear head, hand chipped from organic rock.”  This scene is laughable because “Grog” would most certainly have used a bazooka to kill mammoths if he could have, yet this is exactly the kind of conversation many sportsman are having today.  

If you don’t tie your own flies, reload your own shells and make your own arrows, you, my friend, aren’t a committed outdoorsman.  If your mode of transportation wasn’t your feet, once you arrived at the trail head, you’re not “hardcore” and you may be unsportsmanlike.  If you use a crossbow rather than a long bow, or a scoped rifle rather than a black powder rifle, well, you’re certainly not a purist and you probably won’t be invited over for Montana micro brews later.  The reality is that all of these judgements are subjective and relative.  People enjoy their chosen niche in the hunting and fishing world for different reasons.  Additionally, with the constant influx of new hunting related technologies it becomes difficult, even for the most principled outdoorsman, to determine which are sportsmanlike and which are not.   Who am I to assume that I am enjoying myself more because I am using a dry fly and the guy down river is using scented bait?  How did I decide that calling a bull elk in with a fake bugle is more fair to the elk than the guy who shoots that same elk from a hay field with a bi-pod at 500 yards?  And why should fish finders be legal but not drones (as a method of finding game)?


With that said, we cannot allow a free-for-all if we want sustainable wildlife populations for future generations of hunters and fishermen to come.  Limits and seasons must be set for different methods and technologies for hunting and fishing.  But they should be set for reasons of safety, population management and equal opportunity to different types of sportsman (notice I didn’t write equal access).  They should not be set against certain outdoorsmen because their means of hunting and fishing is deemed unethical or unfair by a certain sub-set of sportsman.  So take a step back from the chain of sportsman snobbery and get some real perspective before you badmouth the guy across the river.  That’s true Montana.

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Montana Gridiron: Why I like football in Montana

The snap was good.  The thermometer read 10 degrees and they had already cleared snow from the field at halftime.  Armanti Edwards, rolled out to his left and threw a short pass to his best wide receiver, Brian Quick, just inside the end-zone.  The pass went beyond the outstretched arms of star cornerback Trumaine Johnson and touched off Quick's finger tips and onto the AstroTurf.  As the snow came down, reflecting off the huge ESPN stadium lights, there was a magical ambiance in the air as more than 26,000 Montana Grizzly fans went wild. We shouted, groaned with relief, high-fived and hugged other fans we had never met.  We were going to the national championship game! 




The game, start to finish, was the most amazing I have ever watched in person, but how it ended is a what I will always remember.  After going up by a touchdown, Montana fans experienced a terrifying last minute drive when Edwards led App State the length of the field in the final 1:31, converting on a fourth down and ultimately getting two shots at the end-zone from the 3 yard-line.  Edwards, who had led Appalachian State to two national championships with his duel threat quarterbacking would be drafted in the 3rd round of the NFL draft later that year.   In addition to the heart stopping goal-line stand, the game also featured the ESPN college hit of the year by a Montana's Keith Thompson on an App State receiver.  The drama of the ending along with the surreal ambiance made the game an instant classic.  It also capped off what had already been an incredible year in Montana football, including a 27 point comeback earlier in the playoffs against the SDSU Jack Rabbits, which was sparked by a 98-yard Marc Mariana kick-return.  The Griz ended the season 14-1 after being defeated in the national championship by Villanova. 










Football may not be religion in Montana like it can be in Texas or the South but that doesn't mean our state lacks football excitement or success.  Carroll College is still the only team in any division to have won 4 national championships in a row and almost every year MSU and/or U of M make it to the FCS playoffs as contenders.  Additionally, it is often players who grew up playing football in Montana that are the stars of these teams and many get drafted or signed into the NFL.











I think being a football fan in Montana is more fun than in places where football is everything.  Maybe its the fact that we have nothing to prove or that football isn't everything for Montanans.  Montana isn't known for football nationally and even though we love it, football still has to compete with hunting for people's attention in the fall.  Maybe its the personal touch and actually knowing and wanting to root for the players on the field.  We don't have a pro team and by its nature, college football is more personal.  When you cheer on your Montana college football team(whichever team it is), its not just your team you're cheering for, you're rooting for the kid you went to high school with, or played against.  That same kid will probably come home this summer and work the harvest just like everyone else....and then he might get drafted next year.  But he'll still be a Montanan, a real person you can talk to, who succeeded just as much because of his Montana work ethic as his athletic ability.  That's True Montana.