Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Are fly fisherman really morally superior? The chain of sportsman snobbery



And we were left to assume, as my brother and I did, that all first-class fishermen on the Sea of Galilee were fly fishermen and that John, the favorite, was a dry-fly fisherman.

Norman McClain- A River Runs Through It

In his novel which was set in the 1920s, A River Runs through It, Norman McLain clearly demonstrates the feeling of moral superiority felt by fly fisherman over bait fisherman.  In the quote above and others, particularly the interaction between Norman and Paul with Norman’s brother-in-law (a bait fisherman), one can clearly see the sportsman snobbery that persists to this day.  In the last century, as hunting and fishing gradually shifted from an efficient way to provide food for your family, to more of a leisure lifestyle choice, outdoorsmen have become snobs.  Each outdoorsman finds some way to look down on other outdoorsmen who enjoy related outdoor pass times.  

Hunters and fishermen seem particularly prone to these types of comparisons.  You might insist that this is simply human nature and you might be right, but when it comes to outdoorsmen, it takes a strange twist.  For thousands of years, humans have been hunting and fishing as a means of survival but only recently have they intentionally limited themselves in how and when they can participate in these activities.  Hunting and fishing, in many ways, are trending back to the caveman.  Montana recently even passed a law that legalizes spear hunting!  It seems the more primitive and minimalistic your gear and techniques are, the more of a pure sportsman you are.  If you look back to the cave man days, it is hard to imagine “Grog” telling his brother “Gronk” that it is unsportsmanlike to hunt mammoths with iron spear tips…. “Idiot!  The way of the purist, the way of the sportsman, is most certainly the obsidian spear head, hand chipped from organic rock.”  This scene is laughable because “Grog” would most certainly have used a bazooka to kill mammoths if he could have, yet this is exactly the kind of conversation many sportsman are having today.  

If you don’t tie your own flies, reload your own shells and make your own arrows, you, my friend, aren’t a committed outdoorsman.  If your mode of transportation wasn’t your feet, once you arrived at the trail head, you’re not “hardcore” and you may be unsportsmanlike.  If you use a crossbow rather than a long bow, or a scoped rifle rather than a black powder rifle, well, you’re certainly not a purist and you probably won’t be invited over for Montana micro brews later.  The reality is that all of these judgements are subjective and relative.  People enjoy their chosen niche in the hunting and fishing world for different reasons.  Additionally, with the constant influx of new hunting related technologies it becomes difficult, even for the most principled outdoorsman, to determine which are sportsmanlike and which are not.   Who am I to assume that I am enjoying myself more because I am using a dry fly and the guy down river is using scented bait?  How did I decide that calling a bull elk in with a fake bugle is more fair to the elk than the guy who shoots that same elk from a hay field with a bi-pod at 500 yards?  And why should fish finders be legal but not drones (as a method of finding game)?


With that said, we cannot allow a free-for-all if we want sustainable wildlife populations for future generations of hunters and fishermen to come.  Limits and seasons must be set for different methods and technologies for hunting and fishing.  But they should be set for reasons of safety, population management and equal opportunity to different types of sportsman (notice I didn’t write equal access).  They should not be set against certain outdoorsmen because their means of hunting and fishing is deemed unethical or unfair by a certain sub-set of sportsman.  So take a step back from the chain of sportsman snobbery and get some real perspective before you badmouth the guy across the river.  That’s true Montana.

No comments:

Post a Comment